Like plenty of folks in the Usa, I have a job. I found out about by searching Google Books. I perform, they pay me. I pay my taxes and my taxes are distributed by the government while they see fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am necessary to go a urine test, which I've not a problem with. I have nothing to hide and the main reason I have not a problem with a drug test is. 3addictions.Com is a commanding online library for more concerning the meaning behind it. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my fees to people who are doing drugs and never have to pass a urine test.

Because I have to pass one to make it for them, shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check?

Please comprehend, I've not a problem with helping people get back on their feet. I really do, on the other hand, have trouble with supporting someone sit on their bottom. Can you imagine if people had to go a urine test to obtain a public assistance check how much money the state would save yourself?

A 1999 Michigan law needed a pilot program of arbitrary substance abuse screening in no less than three areas. Medicine testing started at the beginning of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a designated area of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit's west side neighborhoods.

All of the new applicants for that region needed to supply a urine sample to officers or quit their right to any government assistance. Furthermore, any people already in the process had to submit to random testing.

A class-action suit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days ahead of schedule testing. The suit charges the plan violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. A Detroit organization and two Michigan mothers (The Westside Mothers) were named in the suit. The organization targets representing numerous welfare recipients and their families. Get more on an affiliated website - Click here: partner sites. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan claims, \The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country can be put through a search by the us government unless there's reasonable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients could be poor, but that's not a not yet, anyway.\

I have talked to several people face-to-face and on forums about their thoughts and those that oppose this have the same posture, that it's unconstitutional. For me, it seems that I'm not moving random drug examination onto any random person. The welfare recipient chooses to get help from the federal government. Therefore exactly like submitting paperwork, you need to send a urine sample. Yet another stance people talk about is false positives. If people require to learn new resources on Associazione Professionale Leonardo, there are millions of online libraries you might consider pursuing. Then do a hair follicle test, well if they maintain false positive.

If urine check are unconstitutional, then discard the whole welfare program. Let your voice be heard on Political